The next deadline for submissions is: September, 2008.
Download the poster
Recent Articles
- Volume 4 Staff
- The Justice System in Canada: Does it Work for Aboriginal People?
- Maori Women Confront Discrimination: Using International Human Rights Law to Challenge Discriminatory Practices
- "Indigeneity" as Self-Determination
- Establishing Autonomous Regimes in the Republic of China: The Salience of International Law for Taiwan's Indigenous Peoples
- Sovereignty in Law: The Justiciability of Indigenous Sovereignty in Australia, the United States and Canada
- Ogawa v. Hokkaido (Governor), the Ainu Communal Property (Trust Assets) Litigation
- Paul G. McHugh, Aboriginal Societies and the Common Law: A History of Sovereignty, Status and Self-Determination
Back Issues
Stay In Touch
To receive Calls and event details, enter your email address below
(<10 messages per year):
Maori Women Confront Discrimination: Using International Human Rights Law to Challenge Discriminatory Practices
This article discusses the Women's Convention and, in particular, the Optional Protocol procedure, in order to examine the extent to which international human rights law may play a role in eliminating discrimination against Maori women in New Zealand. I explore the different kinds of discrimination Maori women experience in New Zealand, such as discrimination that occurs in customary contexts and state imposed discrimination, all of which has been encouraged by sexist colonial laws and practices that affect the role of Maori women in public life. Drawing on feminist Indigenous perspectives, I discuss the challenges Maori women may encounter when engaging with international human rights law and, in particular, the Women's Committee in our attempts to overcome discrimination at home. Although I conclude that there may be some benefits for Maori women who choose to pursue a complaint under the Women's Convention based on state imposed discrimination, we should not, at present, pursue a complaint based on discrimination experienced in customary Maori contexts. This is because international human rights fora, such as the Women's Committee, are not the right places to remedy discriminatory cultural practices that are arguably sourced in tikanga Maori.
KERENSA JOHNSTON, Faculty of Law, University of Auckland. My tribal affiliations are to the Ngaruahinerangi iwi on the west coast of the North Island of New Zealand. I am grateful to Nga Pae o te Maramatanga, The National Institute of Research Excellence for Maori Development and Advancement, for their assistance and support while writing this article.
Editor Login :: Best viewed with Firefox
